There was certainly an improvement, although the standard model worked well, too. For example, with some of my architecture shots from Scotland, I used the Lines model, which is recommended for architecture with straight lines. I tested the different AI models, and the results do seem to be better than just using the standard (non-AI) model. Four different AI models in Topaz Gigapixel AI This adds another 1.9 GB of storage requirements, so if you don’t have a powerful desktop PC for editing or plenty of hard drive space, it could be an issue. The AI models are really useful, although I don’t like how you have to download them separately the first time you open the software. Before and after view of a 6x image enlargement in Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI I like how you can select an enlargement multiplier (I prefer this to specifying exact pixels). You can see in the screenshot below the original photo on the left and the 600% enlargement on the right. I tested various images starting at 1024×683 px, and the file quality remained nearly perfect even up to a 600% enlargement.Īt 600%, I couldn’t see any pixelation or reduction in detail, which is pretty incredible. The other options are great, but if I were a professional and needed the best results when making large prints, I would go with Gigapixel AI. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI is my top enlargement choice, and it’s a clear winner in terms of image quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |